oreodreams.blogg.se

Process version does not match lrtimelapse
Process version does not match lrtimelapse













process version does not match lrtimelapse
  1. PROCESS VERSION DOES NOT MATCH LRTIMELAPSE MANUAL
  2. PROCESS VERSION DOES NOT MATCH LRTIMELAPSE FULL
  3. PROCESS VERSION DOES NOT MATCH LRTIMELAPSE SOFTWARE

No, I don't see much noise, I'm talking about circular white banding in the clouds. ISO 200, F16, 1second exposures with an ND filter (to get blurry mist). I don’t know what you can get for Linux, but many of the video editing programs on Mac and Windows can do this, and some of the photo editing programs as well, from which I’d expect much better, more sophisticated video rendering tools and codecs. Having said that, your video clip seems OK for how it is generated and I would not expect much better, but one can do so much better with various external programs.

PROCESS VERSION DOES NOT MATCH LRTIMELAPSE SOFTWARE

I have always found that those in-camera processors such as for HDR and stacking may be “serviceable” or “passable”, but many of the external software programs which can do these techniques are much more sophisticated and require a heck of a lot more processing power than what these relatively meager camera computers can do. With these kinds of codecs, the more detail and the more motion there is, the more various digital artifacts start to become noticeable, and there is a lot of detail and motion in that mist in your example! I honestly haven’t done much yet with video on the EM1ii, just a couple of quick-check ones when I first got mine, and only live shots, not timelapse, so sorry I can’t be of more help. I’m assuming that this is also using the in-camera time lapse video creator, correct? One thing to be aware of is that the camera is probably processing this in a compressed AVHC codec which minimizes repeating data in each frame, just has key frames ever so often and is trying to minimize the data rate/ file size, just like when shooting a live action video, although it may be an even less sophisticated algorithm in this case than is available for some of the EM1ii’s live video settings.

PROCESS VERSION DOES NOT MATCH LRTIMELAPSE FULL

I see the color noise banding which I believe that you are talking about I’m viewing this on a 10.5” iPad Pro full screen. Were these frames also at ISO 200? What shutter speed and f-stop? Look at 0:21s and 0:35s here (downsized, but the same banding appears in the original FullHD clip): The image has some dark regions, but the banding appears in the white clouds. Were you shots very underexposed? That's the only time I see any banding with my E-M5 MII.

PROCESS VERSION DOES NOT MATCH LRTIMELAPSE MANUAL

Interesting, I don't see banding in the 4K time lapse video "movie" created from my manual exposure mode in my E-M5 MII. Maybe using the equalized individual frames is the only option. When light changes a lot, it is hard to get something good out of a fixed exposure. The problem with allowing the camera to autoexpose each frame is exactly what you have observed, particularly for the case of the sun playing hide-and-seek with the clouds, the lighting levels going up and down and up and down on the other hand, when you are shooting a trending light change such as during sunset and into twilight and nighttime, some adjustments are necessary, and autoexposure is one option, though which mode and other settings and adjustments will also come into play.

process version does not match lrtimelapse process version does not match lrtimelapse

Luis, search for their website and he has some excellent writing on that topic, even if you find the software too expensive. Yes, LRTimelapse is an amazing program to process your TimeLapse. I looked at this program some time ago but I do not own it. I believe that the LRTimelapse program at least makes the job of creating smooth transitions a bit easier.















Process version does not match lrtimelapse